Purpose. A concise, copy-pasteable FAQ for SSM-Clock Stamp (SSM-CS), expanded with context on traditional timestamping and why SSM-CS matters. All math is plain ASCII.
Q1. What is the SSM-Clock Stamp in one line?
An offline, ASCII-only stamp that binds exact file bytes, a human-verifiable clock, and an append-only chain:SSMCLOCK1|iso_utc|rasi_idx|theta_deg|sha256(file)|chain[|kv:...]
with chain_k = H_chain( ascii(chain_{k-1} + "|" + stamp_core) ) and chain_0 = "0"*64.
Q2. How does it compute time without ephemeris or network?
From UTC only (no ephemeris):wrap360(x) = x - 360*floor(x/360)theta_deg = wrap360( (unix_seconds / 86400) * 360 )rasi_idx = floor(theta_deg / 30)
Printed with exactly theta_prec digits (default 5, ties-to-even, IEEE-754 binary64).
Q3. Why is this different from classic methods (TSA, PKI, blockchain)?
- TSA/PKI: need online trust infrastructure and keys; give “not-before T.”
- Blockchain: needs nodes/fees; gives public time via block inclusion.
- SSM-CS: zero ceremony, fully offline at stamp/verify time; you optionally publish a day roll-up later for “no-later-than T_pub.”
Daily anchor:rollup_D = sha256( ascii(Stamp_1 "|" ... "|" Stamp_n) )after canonical sort by(iso_utc, stamp_core, chain).
Q4. What guarantees do I get, exactly?
- Integrity:
h_file = H_algo(file_bytes)flips on any byte change. - Local ordering: chain rewalk detects deletions/reorders at first mismatch.
- Determinism: identical outputs across tools following the same rules.
- Optional public time bound: daily
rollup_Dyields a “no-later-than” claim.
Q5. What does SSM-CS not guarantee by itself?
Not authorship, not absolute legal time, not confidentiality. For authorship, sign the exact ASCII line:sig = Ed25519_sign(priv, ascii(SSMCLOCK1|...|chain)) (verification is analogous).
Q6. Where does SSM-CS fit among “offline timestamping” options?
True offline timestamping is rare; most schemes still depend on TSA/PKI or blockchains for trust/time. SSM-CS fills the gap: purely local integrity + relative order now, and a cheap later public bound (daily anchor). It is not a full time oracle, but it revolutionizes offline, low-ceremony use.
Q7. What big practical impacts can this unlock?
- Accessibility in low-resource settings: no accounts/keys/network.
- Cost: stamping is free; anchoring is a simple publish step.
- Scale/composability: streaming hashes for big files; per-stamp agility via
kv:(e.g.,sha3_256,blake2b-256); multi-device provenance viakv:chain_id,kv:device. - Human-centric checks:
theta_deg/rasi_idxare interpretable “clock state,” not opaque nonces.
Q8. What are the key limitations/challenges to keep in mind?
- Not a time oracle: backdating is possible within the anchor window; mitigate by publishing anchors promptly.
- Chain forks: mitigate by publishing
rollup_D(and optionallywitness_chain_tip) regularly. - No built-in identity: add a signature if non-repudiation matters.
- Adoption: needs awareness and tools; kept observation-only to avoid misuse in safety-critical contexts.
Q9. What is in the kv: tail, and why?
Policy/agility without breaking format, e.g.:kv:algo=sha256;chain_algo=sha256;theta_prec=5;float=ieee75464;time_mode=derived_utc
Defaults if absent: algo=sha256, chain_algo=sha256, theta_prec=5, float=ieee75464, time_mode=derived_utc. Parsers ignore unknown keys.
Q10. How strict is formatting and printing?
Very strict (for portability and audit):
- UTC Z only:
iso_utc = "YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"(no subseconds, no:60). - Fixed-digits angle: exactly
theta_precfractional digits, ties-to-even. - All digests: lowercase 64-hex.
- Hash inputs:
ascii(...)of the literal characters;|is the sole delimiter; no spaces.
Q11. What does a minimal workflow look like?
- Stamp on create/update (emit sidecar, append ledger).
- Verify before use (
HASH_OK,CLOCK_OK, plusCHAIN_OKif ledger present). - Anchor daily by publishing the
rollup_Dnote. - Batch audit periodically (verify-all + ledger rewalk).
Q12. Can I run an “actual-time” mode without changing the stamp?
Yes (optional): set kv:time_mode=observed and keep ASCII evidence lines in a sidecar. Core verification is unchanged; anchors still provide the public bound.
Navigation
Back: SSM-Clock Stamp – Reference Pseudocode (11)
Next: SSM-Clock Stamp – Q&A (12B) — Domain Uses, Hybrids