8.7 — Week-1 pilot packet (fill-in templates)
• Pilot charter.KPIs = [<kpi1>, <kpi2>, <kpi3>, <kpi4>, <kpi5>]Sites = [<site_a>, <site_b>]Mode = read-onlyWindow = 14 days baseline + 14 days lane-visible
• Success criteria. Equal classical outputs; reduction in 2+ of {waste, false_alarms, oscillations, ops_toil}.
• Report outline. Context, E1..E12 summary, KPI deltas, economics by lever, logs and stamps, next-step recommendation.
8.8 — Safety case outline (promotion from advisory to scoped closed loop)
• Hazard analysis. List actuators and failure modes; confirm none depend directly on a in phase 1.
• Mitigations. Clamps, bounded lane, advisory-only controls, rollback switch.
• Evidence. Pilot logs, PASS gates, operator training, incident review.
• Change request. Specific policies referencing bands, thresholds, revert plan, monitoring.
• Approval. Sign-offs from safety, domain engineering, and operations.
8.9 — Audit and stamping workflow (trust by default)
• Daily roll-up. Append the manifest to each day’s log archive.
• Offline verification. Recompute E1..E12 and a random sample of KPIs from raw inputs; confirm equality within tolerance.
• Chain-of-custody. Maintain an append-only list of archive hashes; optionally include a stamp line of the formSSMCLOCK day=YYYY-MM-DD bundle_sha256=<bundle_hash> manifest_sha256=<manifest_hash> chain=<prev_hash>
• External anchor (optional). Store the latest hash in a cheap external registry if needed.
8.10 — Go / no-go board checklist (one slide, ten questions)
- Are
eps_a,eps_w,gamma, division policy, and bands frozen and published in the manifest? - Do
E1..E12PASS under CI withtol = 1e-12? - Is
batch == stream == shuffleddemonstrated for your fusion KPIs? - Are operators trained and UIs showing value plus band clearly?
- Is the rollback switch proven in staging?
- Are logs stamped and reproducible offline?
- Are savings KPIs tied to money and tracked in the pilot report?
- Are safety boundaries documented and no actuator depends on
awithout approval? - Is the pilot window long enough to capture representative conditions?
- Do we have a written revert plan and owners for each dimension?
Navigation
Back: Shunyaya Symbolic Mathematical Hardware – Readiness: Telemetry Schema, Band Policy & CI Gates (8.4–8.6)
Next: Shunyaya Symbolic Mathematical Hardware – Software Reference: Minimal API & Quickstart (9.1–9.3)
Directory of Pages
SSMH – Table of Contents